[Inquiry] Re: Sign Relations -- Commentary

[Jon Awbrey]

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

SR.  Commentary Note 26

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

Peirce List,

One of the fonder illusions of nominal thinking is that there is
an absolute distinction between generals and individuals, beyond
any that are relative to the conventions of a particular context.
On the contrary, the relativity of this distinction to a context
of interpretation, in other words, to a particular sign relation,
means that 3-adic relations are the minimal context in which one
can talk about qualities and reactions.

Jon Awbrey

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o