[Inquiry] Re: Logic 101

Jon Awbrey jawbrey at att.net
Thu May 5 15:42:47 CDT 2005


o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

LOG.  Note 17

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

| Lowell Lecture 9 (cont.)
|
| Thus we have
|
|             ( 'Term' intended to refer to a ground --
|             (    whose object is formally a Quale
|             (
|             ( 'Proposition' intended to refer to a correlate -- 
|    'Symbol' <    whose object is formally a Relate
|             (
|             ( 'Argument' intended to refer to an interpretant --
|             (    whose object is formally a Representation
|
| Having, thus, made the first grand division of symbols --
| a division which is properly logical since as the second
| series of definitions shows it concerns the reference of
| the symbol to its object -- we must take up each kind of
| symbol and study it by itself.
|
| C.S. Peirce, 'Chronological Edition', CE 1, 478
|
|"The Logic of Science, or, Induction and Hypothesis",
| Lowell Institute Lectures (1866), pp. 357-504 in:
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce:  A Chronological Edition',
|'Volume 1, 1857-1866', Peirce Edition Project,
| Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o



More information about the Inquiry mailing list