[Inquiry] Re: Questions Involving Pure Symbols -- Discussion

[Jon Awbrey]

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

QUIPS.  Discussion Note 6

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

MD = Michael J. DeLaurentis

Re: QUIPS-DIS 4.  http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-May/002605.html
In: QUIPS-DIS.    http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-May/thread.html#2602

MD: Jon -- Are you meaning to write 'TTT, TFF, FTF, FFF'?

Michael,

No, I was deliberately putting the functional value in front
of the arguments in accord with the way that Peirce orders
<relate, correlate 1, correlate 2> in many, but not all,
of his corresponding accounts of the functional "of".
So we are thinking of "the conjunction of __ and __"
as a rheme that denotes T only when the two blanks
are both filled with T.

Jon Awbrey

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o