[Inquiry] Re: Attribute, Impute, Represent

[Jon Awbrey]

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

AIR.  Note 4

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

| We may also make the following scheme.  Let
|
|    1 stand for Reference to a Ground
|
|    2 stand for Reference to a Correlate
|
|    3 stand for Reference to an Interpretant
|
| The [1] is Quality, [1 2] is relation, [1 2 3] is representation.
| In relation, the references are separable in Equiparance which we may
| write [1 2] and inseparable in Disquiparance which we may write [1^2].
| In representation:  in Likeness the references are all separable [1 2 3];
| in Indication, reference to a ground is not separable but the two first
| references are separable together [1^2 3];  in Symbolization all are
| inseparable [1^2^3].
|
| C.S. Peirce, 'Chronological Edition', CE 1, 476
|
|"The Logic of Science, or, Induction and Hypothesis",
| Lowell Institute Lectures (1866), pp. 357-504 in:
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce:  A Chronological Edition',
|'Volume 1, 1857-1866', Peirce Edition Project,
| Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.

NB.  For this transcription, I replaced Peirce's vertical arrays
with horizontal arrays, for example, [1^2^3].  The caret sign (^)
should be read as a type of slur symbol, binding adjacent numbers.

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o