[Inquiry] Re: Sign Relations -- Discussion

[Jon Awbrey]

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

SR.  Discussion Note 7

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

JA = Jon Awbrey
KM = Kirsti Määttänen

Re: SR-COM 13.  http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-January/002260.html
In: SR-COM.     http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-January/thread.html#2242

In part:

JA: and so it is only with a whole lot of luck and work that we ever
    begin to extract common senses out of the massa confusa of all
    this initial idiosyncracy. 

KM: Well, here I do not agree.  This follows from an adultomorphic view
    of human understanding and qualities (=> classes) of human experience.

I'm not talking here about the acquisition of the core language,
but about the more generally analogous problems that we have to
achieve without the help of several million years of evolution.

KM: By the way, you seem to have noticed that
    there is a system in my use of ( ).
    Have you?

You always deploy them in pairs?
(Minimal committment hypothesis.)

Jon Awbrey

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o