[Inquiry] Re: Sign Relations

Jon Awbrey jawbrey at att.net
Tue Jan 4 10:45:15 CST 2005


o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

SR.  Note 5

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

| But not to follow this subject too far, we have now established three species
| of representations:  'copies', 'signs', and 'symbols';  of the last of which
| only logic treats.  A second approximation to a definition of it then will
| be, the science of symbols in general and as such.  But this definition
| is still too broad;  this might, indeed, form the definitiun of a
| certain science which would be a branch of Semiotic or the general
| science of representations which might be called Symbolistic, and
| of this logic would be a species.  But logic only considers
| symbols from a particular point of view.
|
| C.S. Peirce, 'Chronological Edition', CE 1, p. 174.
|
| Charles Sanders Peirce, "Harvard Lectures 'On the Logic of Science'", (1865),
|'Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 1, 1857-1866',
| Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o



More information about the Inquiry mailing list