[Inquiry] Re: Relatives Of Second Intention
Jon Awbrey
jawbrey at att.net
Sun Apr 3 12:40:16 CDT 2005
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
ROSI. Note 7
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| Classification of Simple Relatives (cont.)
|
| d. Fourth, simple relatives are divisible into those which contain elements of
| the form (A:A) and those which do not. The former express relations such
| as a thing may have to itself, the latter (as cousin of __, hater of __)
| relations which nothing can have to itself. The former may be termed
| 'self-relatives'*, the latter 'alio-relatives'. All copulatives are
| self-relatives.
|
|* [Marginal Note] "Instead of self-relatives, better concurrents."
|
| C.S. Peirce, CP 3.136
|
| C.S. Peirce,
|"Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives,
| Resulting from an Amplification of the Conceptions of Boole's Calculus of Logic",
|'Memoirs of the American Academy', Volume 9, pages 317-378, 26 January 1870,
|'Collected Papers' (CP 3.45-149), 'Chronological Edition' (CE 2, 359-429).
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
More information about the Inquiry
mailing list