[Inquiry] Re: Relatives Of Second Intention

Jon Awbrey jawbrey at att.net
Sun Apr 3 12:40:16 CDT 2005


o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

ROSI.  Note 7

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

| Classification of Simple Relatives (cont.)
|
| d.  Fourth, simple relatives are divisible into those which contain elements of
|     the form (A:A) and those which do not.  The former express relations such
|     as a thing may have to itself, the latter (as cousin of __, hater of __)
|     relations which nothing can have to itself.  The former may be termed
|     'self-relatives'*, the latter 'alio-relatives'.  All copulatives are
|     self-relatives.
|
|* [Marginal Note] "Instead of self-relatives, better concurrents."
|
| C.S. Peirce, CP 3.136
|
| C.S. Peirce,
|"Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives,
| Resulting from an Amplification of the Conceptions of Boole's Calculus of Logic",
|'Memoirs of the American Academy', Volume 9, pages 317-378, 26 January 1870,
|'Collected Papers' (CP 3.45-149), 'Chronological Edition' (CE 2, 359-429).

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o



More information about the Inquiry mailing list