[Inquiry] Re: Differential And Riemannian Manifolds
Jon Awbrey
jawbrey at oakland.edu
Thu May 1 21:06:42 CDT 2003
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
DARM. Note 13
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| 2.2. Submanifolds, Immersions, Submersions (cont.)
|
| As with immersions and submersions,
| we have a characterization of
| transversal maps in terms
| of tangent spaces.
|
| Proposition 2.4. Let X, Y be manifolds of class C^p (p >= 1)
|
| modeled on Banach spaces.
|
| Let f : X -> Y be a C^p-morphism,
|
| and W a submanifold of Y.
|
| The map f is transversal over W
|
| if and only if
|
| for each x in X such that f(x) lies in W,
|
| the composite map:
|
| T_x (f)
| T_x (X) ---------> T_w (Y) ---------> T_w (Y) / T_w (W),
|
| with w = f(x), is surjective and its kernel splits.
|
| Proof. If f is transversal over W, then for each point x in X such
| that f(x) lies in W, we choose charts as in the definition,
| and reduce the question to one of maps of open subsets of
| Banach spaces. In that case, the conclusion concerning
| the tangent spaces follows at once from the assumed
| direct product decompositions.
|
| Conversely, assume our condition on the tangent map. The
| question being local, we can assume that Y = V_1 x V_2 is a
| product of open sets in Banach spaces such that W = V_1 x 0,
| and we can also assume that X = U is open in some Banach space,
| x = 0. Then we let g : U -> V_2 be the map !p! o f, where !p!
| is the projection, and note that our assumption means that
| g'(0) is surjective and its kernel splits. Furthermore,
| g^(-1)(0) = f^(-1)(W). We can then use Corollary 5.7
| of the inverse mapping theorem to conclude the proof.
|
| Lang, DARM, pp. 27-28.
|
| Serge Lang,
|'Differential & Riemannian Manifolds',
| Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1995.
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
More information about the Inquiry
mailing list