[Inquiry] Arisbe ~> Inquiry
elijah wright
elw at stderr.org
Sun Mar 9 22:05:32 CST 2003
started this quite a while ago, and forgot to finish and send it:
> Subject: [Inquiry] Arisbe ~> Inquiry
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> EW = Elijah Wright
> JA = Jon Awbrey
>
> JA: Mind still fuzzy/flexible on the collab idea, just the notion that it
> would involve something a little bit more like "working together" on a
> common concern or toward a common goal, and something a little bit less
> like combat.
>
> EW: more thoughts/details would probably be good ;)
>
> they never learn ...
of course not. my task in life is to provoke those around me into action.
(i consider this a good thing, one that is generally very useful ;) )
> EW: it might be a good idea to start a new space here, rather than trying
> to layer it onto the top of the Arisbe list. I can make a new list
> rather quickly, if you let me know what you want to call it. ...
> and am happy to do so.
>
> JA: Hmmm, the word "inquiry" comes to mind ...
>
> EW: list created.
>
> EW: http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/inquiry
>
> wow! thanks! and so nifty, too!
> i've already unblanked the slate.
i noticed. was greatly entertained by the "how will i answer this
question" post sent to a list called, "inquiry". very recursive.
> EW: what sort of collaboratory experiments do you have in mind?
>
> JA: Pretty open, I guess. Jack Park had a nice idea with his
> Nexist project, and I put a half-year's work into that,
> but after a while the database system just couldn't
> handle the load, complexity, connectivity,
> or something, we never could figure.
>
> EW: i have some loose familiarity with jack park's stuff ...
> fairly interesting.
>
> yes, he's onto version 2+ last i heard,
> but the idea of retyping the text and
> rebuilding the structure i had before --
> brrr! -- so he was supposed to let me
> know when he got a good export package
> up and running ...
can he dump his database out so that i can re-import it and then do useful
things with it? (is he working in SQL these days or what? or is it still
wiki-text? if he can just give me a dump of the whole directory, i might
be able to suck it into some other system. it would probably break all
the links, sadly...)
> EW: episodically -> narrative, at least for me.
> or maybe i'm just inured in that tradition.
>
> yes, chunking and storytelling, stepwise e-laboration by any other name ...
e-labor-ation ;)
> EW: tools to support narrative would be fairly interesting to
> investigate. especially across very complicated problem domains. (like
> peirce :) )
>
> i used to lurk a lot on ohs & unrev & various satellite sites of engelbart's planet,
> where people are always talking about the fancy new tools that they have in the works,
> but it has always been a bit hard for me to see the transition from talk to action ---
> though i know that it always happens, eventually --- still, i have grown impatient ...
a couple of my fellow students here (chris dent and kathryn labarre) were
working on integrating 'purple numbers' into mailing list archives through
post-email annotation by the participants. i seem to recall that this had
something to do with collaboratively developed systems for faceted
classification (or something similar), though i confess to not seeing how
;) [i don't understand - not that there's anything wrong with their work
;) ]
> where was i?
>
> idea 1, was to try and develop a working "theory of inquiry" further.
> this is what i'm supposed to be doing in my dissertation, and i still
> have some slim hope left of making that more understandable and viable.
i think that this is a Hard project, but one that is probably worthwhile.
> idea 2, that i had started up at the nexist work site, if you know
> anybody who is up for a transport from pascal to a web-footed language,
> would be to documnet and develop the ideas in my "theme one" program.
> i may try that again soon.
i need to read it. (the nexist site, i mean...)
elijah
More information about the Inquiry
mailing list